Considering ambiguous options
It seems there's ambiguity here, and I should respond concisely with options. I could verify the statistic, list teams that went winless after 12 games along with their survival rates, or provide context about Fiorentina's relegation probability. I want to avoid relying on external sports stats, so I could also ask the user for clarity or suggest general information instead. Given the sentence, it appears they may want rewrites in Chinese, which could include potential titles or commentary. I might reference Cagliari’s survival in 2006-07 for context.Analyzing winless periods
Cagliari had a winless start of 10 games but managed to survive. The claim about "only Cagliari in the past 31 years" might relate to teams not winning in their opening 12 matches. However, in the 2023-24 season, Cagliari finished 15th after their first win around matchday 10. Other teams like Reggina in 2006-07 and Crotone in 2016-17 also faced difficult starts but survived. I think it's best to phrase this carefully and offer to fact-check the details if needed.Preparing a concise response
The CLI style suggests keeping things concise and friendly, so I want to acknowledge the stark stat in Chinese and ask what the user needs—whether it's a fact-check, headline options, or context notes. I’ll include a sample headline and a brief analysis mentioning the small sample size. Notably, only Cagliari has had such a start in the last 31 years, and most teams with 12 winless starts get relegated. I should also provide survival context and necessary odds, along with a few headline options. That's my plan!
如果消息无误,这个数据非常刺眼:开局12轮不胜在意甲几乎等同“深度降级危险”,过去30+年里据称只有卡利亚里在这种起点下最终保级。样本极少,意味着后程要打出近乎欧战区的节奏才行。
可用标题/导语
快速解读

要不要我帮你做一次快核查?